Genus Pseudodineura

Pseudodineura

There are thought to be ten species of Pseudodineura globally, distributed across the Palaearctic and Nearctic regions. In Britain they are represented by three species and in Ireland a single species (Pseudodineura fuscula).

The Pseudodineura can be characterised within the Pseudodineurini by the following features. In the forewing, the basal loop of the anal vein is absent and stub vein A2+A3 is incomplete and straight. The cross vein 2r-m is usually present between cells 1Rs and 2Rs. In the hind wing the anal cell is open through vein 2A being incomplete.

The larvae feed inside blister mines in the leaves of species in the Ranunculaceae.

Species list:

Pseudodineura enslini (Hering, 1923)

Pseudodineura fuscula (Klug, 1816)

Pseudodineura mentiens (Thomson, 1871)

References:

Altenhofer, E. and Pschorn-Walcher, H., 2006. Zur faunistik, biologie und parasitierung der minierenden Blattwespen der tribus Pseudodineurini (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae). Recent sawfly research: Synthesis and prospects, pp.73-82.

Benson, R.B., 1952. Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects. Hymenoptera, Symphyta, Vol 6, Section 2(a-c), Royal Entomological Society, London

Hellén, W. 1960: Die Nematinen Finnlands (Hym., Tenthr.). I. Tribus Pseudodineurini, Cladiini und Nematini part. - Notulae Entomologicae, Helsingfors 40: 1-18

Liston A, Knight G, Sheppard D, Broad G, Livermore L (2014) Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Sawflies, ‘Symphyta’. Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e1168. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1168

Liston, A., Prous, M. and Vardal, H., 2019. The West Palaearctic Pseudodineura and Endophytus species (Hymenoptera, Tenthredinidae). Zootaxa, 4614(3), pp.511-528.

Prous, M., Liston, A., Kramp, K., Savina, H., Vårdal, H. and Taeger, A., 2019. The West Palaearctic genera of Nematinae (Hymenoptera, Tenthredinidae). ZooKeys, 875, p.63.

Smith, D. R. 1976: Sawflies of the tribe Pseudodineurini in North America (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae). - Proceedings of the entomological Society of Washington, Washington 78(1): 67-79